Side-by-side comparison using independent TWU lab measurements
Aggregated spec scores
Scores calculated from TWU RA, weight, head size and string pattern.
Lab data comparison
Measurements from Tennis Warehouse University (TWU)
RA Stiffness — lower = more flex & comfort
Weight — higher = more stability
Swingweight — higher = more plow-through momentum
Choose the Clash 100 Pro v3 if…
Arm-sensitive players, comfort-first
Very flexible — max comfort (RA 57)
Choose the Acrospeed 300 2026 if…
All-court players, intermediate to advanced
Stiff — more power (RA 69)
🎵 String strategy for each frame
These are different rackets — they deserve different string setups.
Clash 100 Pro v3
Very flexible frame (RA 57) — arm-friendly. Pair with a crisp co-poly like Luxilon ALU Power Rough at 54–58 lbs to add control and prevent the string bed feeling too elastic.
Acrospeed 300 2026
Stiff frame (RA 69) with plenty of built-in power. Use a control-biased poly like Luxilon ALU Power at 54–58 lbs, or a hybrid (natural gut mains + poly crosses) for extra comfort.
⚖️ Specs Equalizer
Can I make these specs match?
To match the swingweight of the Clash 100 Pro v3 (SW 327), add 2g of lead tape at the 12 o'clock position on the Acrospeed 300 2026. This raises its swingweight from 324 to approximately 327 kg·cm².
Still not sure?
Find which fits your specific swing
Our 2-minute quiz maps your swing speed, play style, and priorities to TWU lab data to tell you exactly which of these — or something else — is your best match.
Take the 2-minute quiz →Free · No account needed · Backed by TWU lab data